|
The
Red Violin
viewed June 2, 2000 on VHS
Full
Details
Don McKellar and Francois Giraud,
two of the most ambitious creative forces in
contemporary Canadian cinema, set out to weave a
narrative that encompasses thousands of years and miles,
trying to illustrate the frailties of the human
condition in the presence of an object of humanly
crafted perfection, a violin whose music inspires lust,
greed and chaos throughout history.
The story is told through an
amazing though slight double narrative frame of
alternating flashbacks (a modern-day auction of the
violin) with flashforwards (ominous signs of the
violin's fate are foretold in a tarot reading with the
violin maker's wife), a concept much more interesting
than its execution. The film as a whole is a great
concept, buffetted by immaculately lush production
values, but has no characters worth
caring about. The so-called secrets that are
parsimoniously withheld through the length of the film, such as the source of
the violin's color, are transparent.
The many episodes that comprise the
narrative, each revolving aroundthe violin, range from
plausible to ridiculous. The most interesting
concerns the fate of the violin during the Chinese
Cultural Revolution, where a closet music lover tries to
smuggle it out of the country before it is destroyed as
a tool of Western imperialism. On the other hand,
an episode involving an English
aristocrat who uses the violin to feed his creative and
sexual energies is fairly ludicrous. Almost as
silly is Samuel L. Jackson's miscasting as a violin
expert -- it has nothing to do with his race, and
everything to do with his demeanor. His persona
simply doesn't
convey the refinement to come across as a convincing
expert in centuries-old violins. (Whether he can
become convincing as an expert in The Force remains to
be seen with the next Star Wars installment).
Like McKellar and Giraud's pervious
collaboration, 32 Short Films about Glenn Gould, this film is high on concept and yet leaves one a
bit cold at the end. Somehow a violin isn't
enough to string together several centuries of human
strife -- more attention should have been paid to
deepening the human characters so that they're actually
worth caring about. But when your narrative
structure only allows for 20 minutes per set of
characters, you've already set yourself at a
disadvantage.
Home
|