Nosferatu (1922 Murnau)

viewed March 17, 2000 on video

For full information about this film, click here

 

Nosferatu (1979 Herzog)

viewed March 29, 2000 on video

For full information about this film, click here

You know how silent films sometimes feel like they’re filmed just a little slower than normal speed, so scenes seem to take longer than you are used to watching?  Guilty confession: I watched the original Nosferatu while holding down the search button on my remote.  Yes, I probably compromised my viewing by rushing through scenes (though in doing so the people walked and acted at a normal speed) but what it really comes down to is I compromised my viewing by watching the film on video.  In a theater the pacing probably acquires its full somnambulent effect ­ in the dark the power of the vampire emerges.  In my cozy living room the effect becomes less of a spectacle and more of an event ­ like watching news footage of some calamity. 

Nonetheless I released the remote whenever Nosferatu stalked onto the screen.  There is no denying the horrifying power of his presence ­ presaging every less-than human predator that has roamed the landscape seeking to fulfill its single-minded purpose.  Every human machine from Frankenstein to the Terminator is indebted to Nosferatu, his hungry glazed over eyes seeing every man and woman as ripe vessels of blood to be emptied by his rat-like front teeth. 

Murnau takes the idea of this superhuman stalker as inspiration for many magical effects and innovations.  He splices and rearranges frames to make doors open and close by themselves, to make people shrivel and disappear.  Sunrise, the other film I have seen of his, also has its fair share of wonderful visual tricks.  In the mind, these silent effects create their own music ­ whereas Sunrise is rhapsodic in its wild sweep through life in the big city, Nosferatu, as its second title suggests, is “a Symphony of Horror”, single-minded in its purpose and consistent in its dark, mesmerizing tone. 

Unfortunately no amount of fast-forwarding could speed up Werner Herzog’s update on Murnau.  It is often gorgeous to look at with its gloomy vistas of the Transylvanian countryside, but panoramic views are not nearly as interesting as the original’s otherworldly settings in flickering black and white.  In spite of a promising title sequence where hundreds of shriveled heads are displayed in an unknown chamber, the film takes its subject on the high road, substituting décor and realism for passion.  I can’t believe that I would ever describe a Herzog movie as passionless, but this film is, well, bloodless.  Even the exquisite Isabelle Adjani left me cold ­ her exotic virginal qualities could have been exploited to heighten the sexual suspense of the film.  At last at the very end is the chilling scene where Nosferatu sucks her dry, and it’s a great payoff, so obviously a metaphor for copulation that I’m amazed the film didn’t get slapped with an R rating.  But Nosferatu’s death is a big letdown ­ he dies just like a man.  Maybe that’s Herzog’s emphasis, portraying the vampire less as a supernatural force as an afflicted human, but the result is still less than compelling.

Read Roger Ebert's appraisal of the classic version here.

Home