|
Good Men, Good
Women
viewed January 8, 2000 at the
Asian Art Museum
For more information about this film, click
here.
My initiation to the films of Hou Hsiao Hsien was
bewildering, like learning a new language, like going at
it with a professor during a two-hour senior
seminar. While watching it I wasn't sure what I
saw; people who had read about the film couldn't make
much of their actual viewing experience. And yet,
like in the hours following a seminar, the mind is
visited by a succession of realizations, though a final
understanding remains elusive. It challenges the
notion that film is a language simpler than literature,
and that its impact is visceral and immediate.
This is a film that refuses to be forgotten or put
away.
This film was originally intended as the biography of
Chiang Bi-Yu and Chung Hao-Tung, a married couple who,
during World War II, left Taiwan to join the
anti-Japanese campaign on the Mainland. It was
only after a series of bewildering interrogations that
their Mainland compatriots allowed them to join their
ranks. However, upon their return to Taiwan the
couple was persecuted as suspected Communists.
Their experience in Taiwan echoes that of thousands of
Taiwanese who were targeted as subversives to the
Nationalist regime and summarily harrassed, imprisoned
or executed during the "White Terror" period
that followed the war.
In the decades following the "White Terror"
the Nationalist government exerted stifling control of
both the people and the media; the grip loosened only a
decade ago. For example, films could not even feature
native Taiwanese dialects -- only Mandarin was allowed
to be spoken. Hou was one of the first directors to
break this code, and since then he has used local
dialects almost exclusively, as if making up for lost
time.
Lost time seems to be exactly what Hou's filmmaking
is about. Prior to making Good Men, Good Women,
his films were almost all set in the 50s and 60s.
His subjects were all in some way disadvantaged by
social and language barriers as they tried to carve an
existence in post-war Taiwan. In Good Men, Good
Women he brings in a new level of self-reflexivity,
calling into question his own attempts at capturing
Taiwan's suppressed history.
He does this by alternating scenes from the biography
of Chiang and Chung with scenes of the actress playing
Chiang and her own history before her acting career, as
well as scenes of the actress, years after, rehearsing
for her part, while mysteriously receiving faxed pages
of her missing diary. Previously, she had been a
gangster's moll, a drug addict devoid of direction and
dependent on her man for financial and emotional
support. Her scenes shacked up with her boyfriend
in their small apartment are static and languid (evoking
the vacuousness of their existence) but also playful and
beautifully lit -- there is a genuine sense of affection
between the lovers, and the static camera positioning
allows for long takes in which the viewer to appreciate
Hou's masterful composition. There is one scene
where the lovers embrace each other before a mirror, and
it seems that there is a different lighting scheme going
on in each of several different areas on the screen.
In contrast to these luridly colored moments, the
scenes of the actress playing Chiang are shot in a sober
black and white. It is amazing to see this former
druggie playing a political activist of integrity and
determination. Where the actress and the figure
she plays intersect is a matter not easily resolved --
and therein lies the question Hou raises about what
Taiwan's history means to its people today, especially
when the so many Taiwanese are preoccupied with their
material present.
What the link is exactly betwedn the actress and her
role is left for the viewer to determine. One way that
Hou links the woman's past with her acting future is
with scenes of her preparing for her role (in what may
be construed as the film's narrative present). As
she meditates over "how will I become Chiang
Bi-Yu" she mysteriously receives faxed pages of her
missing diary, in which her thoughts on her lover (who
has since been murdered) are exposed. These scenes
open her up to her history, leading to the series of
flashbacks to the past.
The sordidness of her personal history (she was
somewhat of an accomplice in her lover's murder)
contrasts with the piousness in which she portrays
Chiang Bi-Yu. In this way performing the past
becomes a kind of redemptive act for her, of retrieving
a sense of dignity through the experience of her
forebears. This also renders Chiang and Chung into
purified ideals, which is a somewhat problematic take on
history. But perhaps what Hou is concerned about
(and this is evident in his unique approach to
historical filmmaking) is not so much the reality of
history as what people can gain through awareness of
history. There is no question that the actress has
gained something through playing Chiang: she has come to
terms with both the history of her country, and of
herself.
Home
|