Eyes Wide Shut

viewed November 20, 1999 at the Red Vic

For full information about this film, click here

The Red Vic on Haight Street is a quaint single-screen theater, owned by its operators and featuring a great schedule of recent and classic films.  The staff is exceptionally considerate, as I discovered upon being the last person in the ticket line for a packed revival of Eyes Wide Shut, when they offered to refund my ticket if I couldn't find a good seat.  I found a seat right in the middle of the front row, which was slightly painful but offered a  virtual reality-type immersion into the film.  (This reminded me of when a friend once told our high school teacher about his stiff neck after sitting in the front row for a screening of Basic Instinct.  Our teacher replied, "I bet that's not all that was stiff.")

The immersion into the screen was fitting to this dreamlike movie.  Kubrick had a reputation as a control freak who would take countless takes of any given shot, but such manipulation of his actors and scenes is remarkably apt in a film that has the staginess of a dream.  The stilted manner in which most of the actors speak, the grand, lush interiors and especially the deliberate pacing of the plot contribute to an effect that harbors itself in the caverns of consciousness.  This movie, with its approximations of New York locales and an ornate design that is delightfully outdated, cannot be criticized for being unrealistic, because it creates reality in its own terms, like the exquisite remote quality of a great silent movie.

Technically speaking, there is much to love about the film.  Virtually every scene is dazzlingly well lit, from the brilliant curtain of Christmas lights in the opening ballroom sequence, to the harsh contrast of light and shadow during the orgy ritual.  The repetition throughout the movie of high-contrast orange/blue color motifs as well as the moody Ligeti piano melodies linger in the mind for days.  The measured plot structure also renders each scene distinct and easy to recollect in sequence.  It seems that Kubrick has found the right rhythm for cinematic storytelling to reverberate in one's subconscious recollection.  Within that deliberate rhythm there is a lot of range in tone, from dramatic to comic, to erotic, to surreal.  

The nature of this story, about a man's evening of sexual adventures incited by his wife's fantasies, could be construed as a moral tale, but I think Kubrick's focus isn't so much on proper marital conduct as it is on what, if anything, separates the realms of dream and reality, thought and deed.  Nicole Kidman has only a handful of scenes, but her two adulterous monologues cast such a shadow on the pride of Tom Cruise's character that her dreams motivate all of his subsequent actions and pervade the film's fabric of reality.  

What transpires on his wild night unravels very slowly (to the dismay of many viewers) but is still hard to get a handle on (unless you want to dismiss the entire experience as pretentious crap).  Finally, when the Zeus-like Ziegler offers an explanation in his Olympian billiards room, all we get is more uncertainty over the facts.  It is a masterpiece of a scene, with Sydney Pollack's Ziegler as the least-affected, most nuanced performance in the film, so matter-of-factly offering truth, that it can't be believed. 

The film cast a spell on me, like Kidman's monologues did to Cruise.  Like Cruise, I started noticing people around me, wondering about them and whether they noticed me.  The two young Asian girls next to me -- what were they doing at this movie?  Didn't they have some other place to go on a Saturday night?  Were they wondering what I was doing here by myself?  The movie made me feel how unnaturally cramped it is to sit in the front row of a crowded theater -- but as much as it pushed my reflections out to my surroundings, it also opened itself on the screen for me to indulge in its fantasies and fears.  Afterwards I walked down the rain-slicked sidewalks of the Haight, just wondering if anything would happen.  When nothing did, I took the car home, but then decided to follow the 49-mile scenic drive signs to see where they would take me.  I ended up going halfway up Twin Peaks but took a wrong turn before reaching to top.  After weaving and wandering for half an hour I ended up back on the Haight, where I started -- how fitting.

The Chicago critics really loved this movie: read Roger Ebert and Jonathan Rosenbaum.

Home