| |
|
SCREENING LOG
- 6/03--6/09, 2002
Back to 2002 Index
I watched YELEEN (BRIGHTNESS), THE MAD SONGS OF FERNANDA
HUSSEIN, THE FAMILY MAN and PLAYTIME. In no order:
Yeelen (Brightness) (1987, Souleymane Cisse)
I hate it when a movie reminds me of my limitations as a
viewer, which seems to be happening more frequently lately,
perhaps because I've become more self-conscious in my act
of viewing and what assumptions and expectations I bring to
it. In any event, this filmed retelling of an ancient myth
involving a young man who must battle his powerful father
in order to reclaim the mysteries of nature (komo) for the
benefit of the world. In that regard it can be seen as the
African equivalent to STAR WARS, though drawing such a comparison
seems insulting to the depth and thoughtfulness of Cisse's
achievement. Unfortunately I could only grasp this film's
greatness largely on the level of spectacle (and there are
several shots, esp. in the beginning and climax, of breathtaking
visual intensity); sometimes I found myself second-guessing
the director's intent, whether he was indulging in exotic
cultural packaging like an Ang Lee or Zhang Yimou. But for
the most part this was surface-scratching; in the end, the
film answers only to itself, and it will take at least another
screening for me to unpack all that's going on. I know this
film set Rigor off on a personal journey of cultural discovery,
and I thank him for recommending it to me. In turn I highly
recommend it to anyone who is willing to be tested by this
dense but alluring masterpiece, which really feels like it
comes from another world.
The Mad Songs of Fernanda Hussein (2001, Peter Gianvito)
The most important new film I've seen so far this year, this
blistering examination of American life during and after the
Persian Gulf War is one of the most vital experiences I've
had with American independent cinema. The story follows the
downward trajectory of three New Mexico residents: a woman
whose children are the victims of a vicious hate crime because
their last name is the same as that of Saddam Hussein; a high
school student whose increasing interest in peace activism
leads him to run away from his sheltered home; and a returning
soldier who indulges in an empty existence while trying to
shake off the horrors he's witnessed. The film is not perfect,
with some badly acted scenes, and the politics are unquestionably
partisan, though nothing less than compellingly heartfelt.
Made over 6 years and 13 credit cards, this film taps into
a raw live-wire energy that means everything to today's sorry
state of independent filmmaking. Both the characters and the
film brandish a fierce, wounded innocence that gives way to
inconsolable rage at their own ineffectuality under the shadow
of war, modulated by some vivid musical and visual digressions,
and culminating in a finale of apocalyptic spectacle of fascination
and horror. Not everyone will like this, but everyone should
see this.
The Family Man (2001, Brett Ratner)
An updated IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE for the yuppie generation,
with Nick Cage actually imitating Jimmy Stewart at times in
his mannerisms. He plays a Wall St. high-flyer who is magically
transported to the life he could have had if he had stuck
with his college sweetheart and moved to Jersey. Stereotypes
fly hard and fast in contrasting his wine-sniffing Manhattan
lifestyle with his alternate suburban existence measured by
tires sold and bowling pins struck. With occasional moments
of charm, it's not as bad as it could have been, though the
have-your-cake-and-eat-it conclusion undermines any integrity
or insight the film had claimed.
Playtime (1967, Jacques Tati)
I had a most baffling response to this film. On the one hand,
it's the summation of so many things I have dreamed cinema
of being: the sheer joy of watching people busily being themselves,
and a narrative that follows these people with nothing more
or less than an active interest in them, disregarding conventions
of storyline and plot points (and yet a discernible arc does
emerge, miraculously it seems). A camera that captures each
scene from multiple angles, expanding one's sense of space
to unprecedented dimensions. This is a marvelous technical
achievement that informs the work of at least two of my favorite
contemporary filmmakers, Tsai Ming-liang and Abbas Kiarostami.
And yet, it may be Tsai and Kiarostami that have spoiled Tati
for me; while the former artists feature characters whose
mannerisms are low-key in their naturalism, Tati's seem to
ham it up plenty, each gesticulation drawing attention to
its own cuteness. Of course, the idea of life as a performance
is key to Tati's work, and so the stylization of behavior
is a conceit one may very well have to accept, but it still
bugged me. It also didn't help that in saving myself for a
theatrical screening of this film (I've heard that a video
screening doesn't do justice to the density of the compositions),
I still got stuck watching a cut-up 35mm print that seemed
largely out of focus. (something like watching ATTACK OF THE
CLONES off film projection.) I hope the restored 70mm version
that played in Cannes this spring will make it's way to a
BIG movie house near me.
Back to 2002 Index
|