| |
|
SCREENING LOG
- 5/06--5/12, 2002
Back to 2002 Index
I watched TIME OUT, VENGEANCE IS MINE, TAMPOPO and EARTH.
In order of preference:
Earth (1938, Alexander Dovzhenko)
The film event of the week, if not the month, for me, was
not a geek swinging through New York in red and blue tights,
but this revelatory silent film that kicked off a Dovzhenko
retrospective at Lincoln Center, seemingly attended by every
Ukranian VIP in the metropolitan area. My favorite guests-of-honor
were the Alloy Orchestra, the preeminent silent film composers
working today, who unveiled their new score for this film
to tremendous effect.
EARTH was meant to be a propagndist hack job to promote technology
and collective farming in Communist Russia. Dovzhenko, always
eager to outdo his mentor Sergei Eisenstein, created a story
that has as much technical brilliance as Eisenstein's POTEMKIN
or Vertov's MAN WITH THE MOVIE CAMERA, but exceeds both in
its soulful evocation of peasant life and its meditations
on how technology can both help and harm both man and nature.
A ten-minute sequence in the film, where images of working
peasants combine with machines processing food, brilliantly
illustrates this paradoxical, conflicted relationship between
the mechanical and organic, with an editing style so intense
my eyes felt like they would explode. This is a film as full
of life and emotion as F.W. Murnau's SUNRISE, and for my money
exceeds Murnau in using the cinematic medium to merge realistic
images with abstract ideas.
Time Out (2001, Laurent Cantet)
A recently laid-off French businessman cooks up a bunch of
scheming lies with his family and friends in order to project
an image of success and preserve a sense of self-worth. The
remarkable premise suggests that his concocted life really
is no less substantial that the clock-punching he did before;
if anything it feels more alive and meaningful. Aurelien Recoing
gives a devastating performance as the businessman, with an
enigmatic grin that registers politeness and panic at once,
and seems permanently attached to his face. The ending is
both chilling and pat, and reinforces the subtle but vicious
digs the film makes at society's petty bourgeois dependance
on catch-all values (spending "quality time" with the family;
doing "socially-constructive" development work for "emerging
markets").
Vengeance Is Mine (1979, Shohei Imamura)
Imamura, arguably my favorite living Japanese director,
achieved what is generally regarded as his masterpiece with
this unflinching account of the events surrounding a serial
killer's exploits in '60s Japan. I can't say it's my favorite
Imamura film (THE BALLAD OF NARAYAMA broke my heart), but
its view of the killer and his milieu is technically accomplished,
managing to curtail the exploitation factor with insights
on each character that seem casual but precise. Seems to offer
a whole lot to say about Japanese society underneath its stone-faced,
documentary-esque surface. The last scene is a real stunner.
Tampopo (1986, Juzo Itami)
My guess is this is the prototypical example of "art-house
cuisine" cinema a la EAT DRINK MAN WOMAN, LIKE WATER FOR CHOCOLATE,
CHOCOLAT, but I find it rises above the pack for its quirkiness
and narrative flair; as such it aspires to the status of the
ultimate art-house cuisine movie, THE DISCREET CHARM OF THE
BOURGEOISIE (which, incidentally, is the ultimate anti-art-house
cuisine movie). A truck driver with a penchant for noodles
trains a struggling noodle maker on the art and Zen of ramen.
The film has a lot of digressions and sight gags commenting
on the Japanese obsession with both food and business, sometimes
to the point that the message seems somewhat lost, but never
for a moment is the sense of fun obscured. A very enjoyable
film that seems to have been swept under the carpet by those
eager to dismiss the movies of the 80s as junk food.
Back to 2002 Index
|