SCREENING LOG -11/15-11/21, 2004

Back to 2004 Index

Last week I finished my tenure in a 10 week filmmakers workshop, and to blow off some steam I watched a lot of movies (not that I wasn't watching a lot of movies during those 10 weeks). I feel like I'm watching so many movies as if the apocalypse were nigh. Part of it has to do with a resolution, hopefully one that will not go the way of so many failed resolutions of the past - to renounce my cinephilic a

ctivities (watching and discussing movies) in order to spend more time on my own creative endeavors. In anticipation of this sea-change, which is planned to take place in January 2005, it looks like I'm sowing my oats while I can. Part of the sowing has involved a personal project where I am trying to watch at least 10 films from every year of movie history. I've filled all the years from 2004 to 1924, and am now working my way to the origins of cinema. I expect to be finished in January, at about the time I am supposed to stop watching movies.

As if that weren't enough, I'm also going through my to-see list, which over the course of this year has gone from 100 to 1000 titles. My cinephilic universe is expanding and I can't possibly keep up -- which has prompted these thoughts about whether all this movie watching is really getting me anywhere. But nontheless I continue dipping my bucket into the ocean, since I can get these films for free at the library, a most terrible blessing.

And if this weren't enough, there's the Asian DVDs I bought from Chinatown that I still have to watch. And the highly rated films that are currently in release, not to mention the special retro or museum screenings of rare gems. I guess I feel a sense of duty, since there are so many films out there that are available to me that I have to check them out. This mindset needs to be refunneled into something that leads to my own productivity. It seems that long gone are the days when I had time to write paragraph reviews on every movie I'd see each week, a great exercise for meditating and digesting the films one has seen, one that I'm glad that many on this thread continue to practice. For this week, I think the best I can do is distill my viewings into the following summary of what I got out of my week. Hopefully I'll never watch as many movies in one week again...

Chaplin Vs. Keaton, round 3 : For a while I've been more enamored of Chaplin than Keaton, since I felt his films had more social significance whereas Keaton's films were more formal exercises. But this past week's viewings of both artists put me in awe of both of them, especially Keaton. A masterpiece like THE THREE AGES showed that Keaton could meet D.W. Griffith's INTOLERANCE at its own game, and do it with more entertainment, humor and wit. But THE GOAT and THE PLAYHOUSE are high octane Keaton at his most intensely inspired. The nonstop succession of gags are totally cinematic - using tricks of staging and choreography, Keaton keeps pulling the rug from under the viewer's eyeballs, constantly shifting one's perception of reality. Chaplin's SUNNYSIDE does similar wacky, pre-Marx Brothers tricks; my viewings make the case that these two could easily be categorized as leading Surrealist artists of their time. But Chaplin shows his other exteme with A WOMAN OF PARIS, his first directorial effort not starring himself, and a really well-directed melodrama that pulls the heartstrings while meditating on the bittersweet destiny of a "fallen" woman -- for me it's as good as similar stories done by Mizoguchi or Ophuls.

Johnny To : Arguably Asia's most prolific filmmaker right now (the main competition appears to be Korea's overrated Kim Ki-Duk), To has been the pet of HK action buffs, but lately he's showing signs that his talents go beyond this. For one thing, he seems incredibly receptive into trying out new things. I finally got to see THE MISSION, which is generally his most well-known work, but for me it's not nearly as interesting as what he's done lately: the wacky RUNNING ON KARMA (where a beefcake bodybuilder is able to see other's karmic predestinies), or the steady unraveling of masterful set pieces in PTU. BREAKING NEWS tries to deliver the same kind of showmanship (opening with a bravado sidewalk shootout that's practically in 3-D) while showing the manipulation of the media to sway public opinion in a showdown between cops and gangsters -- it amounts to a more action-oriented but less substantive version of DOG DAY AFTERNOON. More compelling is THROW DOWN, an unpredictable tribute to judo and Akira Kurosawa (who is identified as the "greatest filmmaker of all" though I don't see much influence in To's films). I'd say this is To's most touching film, where the characters actually approach real people with real personalities, and not formulas to be tinkered with.

2 x Asian New Wave masterpieces: GROWING UP was written by Hou Hsiao Hsien and his longtime collaborator Zhu Tien-wen, directed by Hou Hsiao Hsien's mentor, and is a watershed of the '80s Taiwanese New Wave. It definitely feels like an early Hou movie, chronicling the passing of time for a young boy and his journey of personal development. It matches a populist sweetness with stunning everyday visuals, nailing a real sense of place and time and the details of a child's existence. PEPPERMINT CANDY, directed by Lee Chang-dong (OASIS) is a stunning blend of FORREST GUMP and IRREVERSIBLE (though much much better than either film) -- a businessman commits suicide at his high school classmates' 20th reunion, and we travel back in time to chart his downward spiral in reverse, alongside the "progress" made by Korean society over 20 years of history, dating back to the terrible Kwanju student massacres of 1980. Sol-Kyung Gu's lead performance kicks Tom Hanks in the ass many times over, and possibly surpasses Robert DeNiro in RAGING BULL as a lucid study of male torment and self-destruction. One of the great films of this decade, from one of the superstar countries of contemporary world cinema.

2 x '50s French crime movies: Finally caught up with RIFIFI and TOUCHEZ PAS AU GRISBI -- I admire them for their iconographic significance (THE movie heist sequence; THE bad-ass French gangster), and moreover the moments of looseness in the staging, where the characters hang out in corners of a room and trade sardonic French wisecracks while exhaling cigarette smoke... but otherwise it's not something I can hold dear to my heart -- like LOLA MONTES, possibly the best Max Ophuls movie I've seen and certainly the most visually stunning.

New releases: For a good stretch of I HUCKABEES, I thought I was watching one of my favorite movies in one of my favorite years of movie watching. But as it spiraled towards its climax and resolution I felt the point getting narrower, not wider -- as with THREE KINGS, David O. Russell sets a lot of things in motion to the point of narrative anarchy, but then feels oddly compelled to have it come to a point of meaning. Still, there's more going on in this film than 95% of American fare, and it fired plenty of synapses in my brain. More enjoyable in retrospect was Almodovar's BAD EDUCATION, which, though it figures an odd neo-noir love triangle involving three men, has a full load of dangerous curves in its plotline to go with the hot gay sex. I liked this film more than other recent Almodovar because it seemed to be trying less to be "important" and delighting in its sinful subject matter, while still unearthing a dangerous idea that desire -- gay, straight or otherwise -- has unavoidably dangerous consequences for everyone in its path.

Museum Specials: El Museo del Barrio had a real rare treat that no newspaper seemed to mention, except for the New York Post (a paper not worth wiping your butt with -- it's owned by Rupert Murdoch -- but happens to have a great staff of film reviewers). The greatest Mexican film of the silent era, with a live narration performed by not one, not two, but three benshis , the traditional performers who would enact all the dialogue and sound effects of the film. The three benshis performed in Spanish, English and Japanese (the latter in tribute to the film culture where benshis originated). The effect was overwhelming and disorienting -- since portions of the film were unsubtitled and the narrators took turns in different language, there was no way to understand all the dialogue all the time, which gave a feeling of incompleteness, which was not irrelevant to the film (which survives in large fragments). Nonetheless the visuals were largely comprehensible and the action moved briskly, much in the same way as a Louis Feuillade crime serial. Without the benshis, the film is a masterpiece, but their live contribution added a special quality of reviving a lost film culture and reinvesting cinema with the joys of live theater.

The big museum news in New York this week was the re-opening of the newly expanded Museum of Modern Art. As part of the celebration, the museum will give both new releases and lost classics (such as Visconti's SANDRA, which I regrettably missed) their first ever premiere screening in New York. I missed Abbas Kiarostami's newest film, FIVE, but I did catch Godard's MOMENTS CHOISIS, which is actually a 90 minute distillation of his magnum opus of film criticism on video, HISTOIRE(S) DU CINEMA (which I still haven't seen). It's an intensely packed audio-visual experience, with frames from films interwoven and overlapping each other, slowed down, reversed, replayed, thoroughly scrubbed over like what Tom Cruise does in MINORITY REPORT, that film by Godard's archnemesis. Godard investigates the cinematic images he's collected over his life that haunt him to this very day -- including archival newsreel or documentary footage of the Nazi deathcamps, which he considers central to the cinematic history of the 20th century, and a haunting part of its legacy. It's an often astounding work, though sometimes I experienced pushback at its more polemical, cranky and despairing moments, as poignant as they may be at times. Some of what he utters strikes me as gibberish, but through it I see a fixation with death. It's contending with death that seems to define cinema for him these days, because in defining death, cinema may possibly transcend it, through images that refuse to die in our memory.

The Three Ages (1923, Buster Keaton)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0014538/

YES (#1 for 1923)

The Goat (1921, Buster Keaton)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0012224/

YES (#1 for 1922)

My Wife's Relations (1922, Buster Keaton)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013422/

yes (#10 for 1922)

The Playhouse (1921, Buster Keaton)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0012570/

YES (#2 for 1921 between THE GOAT and DESTINY)

Cops (1922, Buster Keaton)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013025/

yes (#8 for 1922 between ONCE UPON A TIME and THE TOLL OF THE SEA)

A Woman of Paris (1923, Charles Chaplin)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0014624/

yes (#2 for 1923 between THE THREE AGES and SAFETY LAST)

Sunnyside (1919, Charles Chaplin)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0010747/

yes (#6 for 1919 between SPIDERS and BLIND HUSBANDS)

Breaking News (2004, Johnnie To)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0414931/

yes

Rififi (1955, Jules Dassin)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048021/

yes

Throw Down (2004, Johnnie To)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0415380/

yes (#11 for IMDb 2004 new releases, between FAHRENHEIT 9/11 and I WAS BORN, BUT... #25 for new films seen in 2004 between RUNNING ON KARMA and COWARDS BEND THE KNEE)

I Heart Huckabees (2004, David O. Russell)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0356721/

yes for the first 20 minutes, YES for the next twenty, YES YES for the next twenty, no for the next twenty, mixed for the last twenty, for an overall rating of yes

#8 for IMDb 2004 releases, between MOMENTS CHOISIS and TARNATION

#19 for new films seen in 2004 between GOODBYE LENIN and 15

The Mission (1999, Johnnie To)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0220644/

yes

Le Souriante Madame Beudet / Smiling Madame Beudet (1922, Germaine Dulac)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013626/

yes (#4 for 1922 between HAXAN: WITCHCRAFT THROUGH THE AGES and NOSFERATU)

Peppermint Candy (2000, Lee Chang-Dong)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0247613/

YES (#4 for 2000 between THE HEART OF THE WORLD and YOU CAN COUNT ON ME)

The Woman Next Door (1981, Francois Truffaut)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082370/

yes (#8 for 1981 between THE GARDEN OF EARTHY DELIGHTS and ON GOLDEN POND)

Bad Education (2004, Pedro Almodovar)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0275491/

YES (#4 for IMDb 2004 releases, between ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND and NOTRE MUSIQUE #11 for new films seen in 2004 between ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND and THE FIVE OBSTRUCTIONS

Lola Montes (1955, Max Ophuls)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048308/

YES YES (#2 for 1955 between ORDET and NIGHT AND FOG)

Growing Up (1983, Chen Kun Ho)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085695/

YES YES (#2 for 1983 between LĠARGENT and VIDEODROME)

El Automovil gris (1919, Enrique Rosas)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0009894/

YES YES (#1 for 1919)

Moments choisis (2004, Jean-Luc Godard)

Not listed on IMDb

yes (#7 for IMDb 2004 releases between TROPICAL MALADY and I HEART HUCKABEES #17 for new films seen in 2004 between SARABAND and GOODBYE LENIN)

Touchez pas au grisbi (1954, Jacques Becker)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046451/

yes

Back to 2004 Index

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


email Kevin: kevin@alsolikelife.com